weeeeeeeeeeeeeee

It keeps saying about a tagline, but I don't - oh right.

24,095 notes

nothorses:

moranion:

yeah, yeah, i know, academia is an evil bourgeois lair of useless elitist white cishet men writing self-congratulatory articles about nothing and groping their brilliant female students’ arses and so on and so forth, but occasionally, it is prudent to let some of those useless academics - plenty of whom are women and/or poc and/or lgbt nowadays, how shocking, and who’ve spent their lives learning EVERYTHING about a certain subject - explain a text or a concept to you, so that you don’t run around after with a wildly inaccurate understanding of smth like what ‘social construct’ means, or what Nietzsche was all about, or what Freud actually wrote or did or said, or inventing already invented strains of feminism, etc etc etc

oh, and while i’m at it - this whole “academia is useless” is a belief that the far-right ideology has been extremely fond of all throughout the last century or so. just saying. 

there are entire academic fields built by and about oppressed people. you can get a degree in disability studies, an academic field built on the academic works of disabled people and largely taught by disabled people. one of the colleges offering that degree in the US is among the largest and most prestigious state colleges in the country.

At a certain point the insistence that these people and their work simply doesn’t exist, or isn’t worth engaging with, is just regular bigotry no matter how progressive you think your reasoning is.

(via thoodleoo)

27,148 notes

fluffiest-fox-kira:

summer-oil:

forced caretaking as a trope i think is like cocaine to people who know they need to be taken care of but have mental blocks in the way like yeah please do gently force me into a state of vulnerability so my body learns it is a safe thing to feel around you

This has gotta be a hit with the girlies who have always wanted something terrible to happen to them just so people realize they’re in more misery than their outward appearance lets on

(via theabigailthorn)

29,845 notes

ekjohnston:

girlsontanks:

charlesoberonn:

I was today years old when I found out Loch Ness looks like this and not like an oval like how the cartoons always depict it

image

Nessie turning around in the lake:

image

The extra fun part is that there are 3 other lochs in this chain, smashing the two parts of Scotland together along a fault that also* includes the Appalachians.

*it is obviously more complicated than this, but we’re telling a ghost story, here

(via gingerchangeling)

35,560 notes

parasite-core:

fedoranon:

roadhogsbigbelly:

i’m not saying people shouldn’t be reading more books, but i do think it’s funny how many people thinking “reading comprehension” is just about how good you are at reading books and not like. criticial thinking skills.

Before my niece was in school and her first few summers, I babysat her pretty often, natch. Occasionally I’d take her to a movie (mostly as an excuse to watch a “kids” movie, ha) but there was a lot of PBS and Netflix because then I could lay out the grapes and crackers.

And after the movie, or every few episodes, I’d ask her, you know, what her favorite part was, or what did she think would happen next? Total glass eyes. Okay, okay, favorite is a bit much. Was there a part she liked? A character? ….. Any character’s name?

I told my sister I was concerned of course. I got blown off. And then she started school and started getting notes about her reading comprehension and my sister was like but she knows how to read, I know she knows what words mean! And I was like no no no this is what I was talking about and like. Obviously I read the four year old picture books too but the example that came to mind was being disappointed we couldn’t finish Carmen Sandiego and either not knowing or not wanting to tell me the main character’s name.

And she’s like, well that isn’t reading.

Okay! So! The skill isn’t named correctly but that’s what it is!! That’s what it is for a 4 year old, they should at least be on that level!

It’s not about knowing the most words or the most complicated grammar, it’s about being able to give a basic summary of a post and add a semi-relevant anecdote (lol). on its most basic level, it’s about not pissing on the poor

A handful of people have told me I should have put my tags in the actual post so here you go:

image

(via gingerchangeling)